<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Who Would Jesus Vote For? &#187; Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wwjv4.com/tag/healthcare/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wwjv4.com</link>
	<description>A liberal political/religious blog calling attention to the rampant hypocrisy of the far right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Quick Morning Update</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/politics/quick-morning-update-191</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/politics/quick-morning-update-191#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fidel Castro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/politics/quick-morning-update-191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m unusually busy this morning but wanted to post some quick updates as a lot is going on around the world. Wish I had time to expand on these two stories, but I&#8217;ll update if I get the chance. First &#8211; Fidel Castro has retired. Now he has been in the background of power for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m unusually busy this morning but wanted to post some quick updates as a lot is going on around the world.  Wish I had time to expand on these two stories, but I&#8217;ll update if I get the chance.</p>
<p>First &#8211; Fidel Castro has retired.  Now he has been in the background of power for the past year, after handing over the reigns to his brother, so this may not make any real difference.  <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/02/19/us.castro/index.html?eref=rss_politics" title="Bush is a douchebag">According to Bush</a> &#8220;The United States will help the people of Cuba realize the blessings of liberty.&#8221;  Judging from Bush&#8217;s prior behavior I expect we will start bombing within the week.   Read more at <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/2/19/91453/4541">MyDD</a>, <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2008/02/19/fidel-castro-announces-retirement/">Crooks and Liars</a>, and <a href="http://www.newshounds.us/2008/02/19/castro_has_resigned_as_president_of_cuba.php">News Hounds</a>.</p>
<p>Secondly &#8211; Like America, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/20/world/asia/20pakistan.html?ex=1361163600&amp;en=325f4efe82e9054f&amp;ei=5088&amp;partner=rssnyt&amp;emc=rss">Pakistan is ready for a change</a> after 8 years of oppression and military rule.   Nice to see real Democracy in action, and we didn&#8217;t even have to bomb them.  I know that will sadden some people.</p>
<p>And lastly &#8211; Think Progress wrote yesterday that Bush wants to cut back our funding to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria from $841 million to $500 million.  Worse yet he is billing this $341 million cut as in increase in funds because thats how Republican math works.</p>
<p>Thats all I have time for this morning.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/politics/quick-morning-update-191/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Honesty is not a Family Value</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/republicans/honesty-is-not-a-family-value-96</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/republicans/honesty-is-not-a-family-value-96#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rudy Giuliani]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/republicans/honesty-is-not-a-family-value-96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have already covered Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s tendency to ignore truth in favor of pandering and lying. While we expect a certain amount of pandering from all politicians it becomes a problem when it includes switching stands on long held beliefs. More important we expect, if not honesty about their positions and beliefs, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have already covered <a href="http://wwjv4.com/republicans/romney-taps-toes-at-conservative-christians-38">Mitt Romney</a> and <a href="http://wwjv4.com/republicans/rudy-panders-to-hate-54">Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s</a> tendency to ignore truth in favor of pandering and lying.  While we expect a certain amount of pandering from all politicians it becomes a problem when it includes switching stands on long held beliefs.  More important we expect, if not honesty about their positions and beliefs, honesty about facts and details.  Especially when those facts are something that can be checked and proven.</p>
<p>It shows a certain disdain for the truth to lie about known events to make political points.  It takes an absolute disregard for the truth to continue telling those lies after being called out for them.  Yet that is exactly what Rudy Giuliani&#8217;s campaign has been doing while attacking the Democrats&#8217; health care policies.  Rudy has a <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/31/giuliani-cancer/">radio ad</a> out in New Hampshire where he makes the false claim that survival rates for prostate cancer are 82% here and only 44% under socialized medicine in England.</p>
<p>This statement has come under intense scrutiny because it is completely false.  It is a bold faced lie meant to slander the Democrats and pander to the anti-children&#8217;s health care crowd.  This by itself would not be a story, in fact I was so uninterested in writing about yet another Republican lie I have waited about 3 days to write this.  Here is the thing, whether or not they new before that the numbers were wrong and misleading they absolutely know now.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/30/AR2007103002159.html">The Washington Post</a>, <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21603503/">MSNBC</a>, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/opinion/02krugman.html?em&amp;ex=1194235200&amp;en=53c6be1c4117adba&amp;ei=5087">The New York Times</a>, <a href="http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/a_bogus_cancer_statistic.html">FactCheck.org</a>, and on and on have all voiced the truth.  A New Hampshire Health care group, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2007/11/02/giuliani-commonwealth/">New Hampshire for Health Care</a>, which represents more than 60,000 residents is even demanding the lying ad be taken down.</p>
<p>So here is the story in this that finally got me to write about it.  <a href="http://www.crooksandliars.com/2007/10/31/giuliani-vows-to-lie-with-impunity/">Rudy Giuliani is refusing to take down the ad</a> and continues to repeat the false numbers, even after being caught in the lie.     The only possible reason for this is because they still think they can win political points using it.  This baffled me at first because I didn&#8217;t see how telling a known lie, and being branded a liar, could possibly help in the polls.  Then it occurred to me, it will help because the people he is pandering to do not care that he is lying to them.</p>
<p>For all their talk about &#8220;family values&#8221; and Christian morals the fundamentalist conservatives of this nation could care less that one of their top presidential candidates is lying to them.   The only thing they care about is that they say the right things when they lie.  You know that they hate the gays, that they don&#8217;t trust womenfolk to make their own medical decisions, and that socialized medicine is the devil.  Crazy shit like that.  Reality and facts are just momentary inconveniences that can be ignored whenever they become inconvenient.</p>
<p>It really bothers me that the Republican constituency is so unconcerned with honesty that this kind of behavior is acceptable from their candidates.  This is the kind of issue that should become a campaign issue, you know like Barack Obama&#8217;s name, or Hillary&#8217;s cleavage, or Edwards&#8217; haircut.  Except unlike those three silly issues that got way too much media attention, the honesty and character of a candidate actually matters.  Well, at least it does to the liberals.  Honesty may not be a family value, but it is a liberal value, and we need to demand that our next president is someone we can trust.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/republicans/honesty-is-not-a-family-value-96/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Letter to Todd Tiahrt</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/politics/letter-to-todd-tiahrt-76</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/politics/letter-to-todd-tiahrt-76#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 12:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hypocrisy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCHIP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Tiahrt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/politics/letter-to-todd-tiahrt-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After seeing that one of my state representatives voted against the SCHIP expansion again, after the revisions that addressed each of his &#8220;concerns&#8221; I became angry. I wrote the following letter to him and will keep our readers up to date on his response, if there is one. At this point it seems that it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After seeing that one of my state representatives voted against the SCHIP expansion again, after the revisions that addressed each of his &#8220;concerns&#8221; I became angry. I wrote the following letter to him and will keep our readers up to date on his response, if there is one.</p>
<p>At this point it seems that it is merely a partisan fight. They will not vote for something an overwhelming majority of Americans wants because the Republican leadership doesn&#8217;t want to go against the Republican president on such a big issue. An issue that is a bi partisan, majority supported bill for our frickin&#8217; children!!!</p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2"> </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">Representative  Tiahrt,</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">As a Kansan I  have called every one of our Representatives, participated in several different  vigils and rallies, and worked on my political blog to gain support for the SCHIP  expansion. </font></em><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">I  was very disappointed to see that even after the revisions to the bill that  addressed what your concerns were, you still voted against it in the last  vote.</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2"> </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">    I have 5  children, will be working 3 jobs and my husband works 2. We are lucky that his  main job offers us good insurance for our family. There was a time last year;  however, that wasn&#8217;t the case. Now we have thousands of dollars in medical bills  that piled up very quickly with the birth of our son and his subsequent  illnesses. We made too much money to qualify for Healthwave and we couldn&#8217;t  afford private insurance. </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">    You are  ignoring 81% of the US population that supports the SCHIP expansion, 71% of whom  would support it even if it meant a tax increase. You see, even if our children  aren&#8217;t important to you they are to us. </font></em><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">Due to Republican leadership and  corruption our health care system is seriously flawed. I had to pay $600 for my  baby&#8217;s first check up and immunizations, something that is required by law but  that we could not get assistance for. </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">    I would like to  know what your position is now for not voting for SCHIP. The revisions in the  bill would phase out coverage for childless adults (most states don&#8217;t have this  anyway) within one year, there would not be coverage for anyone making 3 times  the federal poverty level, and it would require stricter checking of social  security numbers.</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">    Surely 35  billion dollars over 5 years is not too much money when it comes to protecting  this nation&#8217;s children. After all, you and your party are only too happy throw  billions more into the illegal Iraq war. Are the deaths of our soldiers and  innocent Iraqis worth more to you than the lives of our  children?</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2"> </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">    The United  States is second only to Latvia for the highest infant mortality rate in modern  countries. It is time to listen to your constituents and stop blindly following  the failed leadership of George Bush and do what is right. </font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">I thank you for  your time and look forward to your response.</font></em></p>
<p><em><font color="#800080" face="Bookman Old Style" size="2">Summer R. Ludwig</font></em></p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/politics/letter-to-todd-tiahrt-76/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush Will Again Veto SCHIP</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/politics/bush-will-again-veto-schip-68</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/politics/bush-will-again-veto-schip-68#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCHIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/politics/bush-will-again-veto-schip-68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although the revised bill costs the same, 35million dollars over 5 years, Democratic leaders say that they have addressed the concerns brought up by the President who vetoed the original bill and the members of the House who voted no on overriding his veto. Namely it will not allow coverage to families who make more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the revised bill costs the same, 35million dollars over 5 years, Democratic leaders say that they have addressed the concerns brought up by the President who vetoed the original bill and the members of the House who voted no on overriding his veto.</p>
<p>Namely it will not allow coverage to families who make more than 3 times the federal poverty line, it would phase out coverage to young childless couples over a one year period (some states offer this, not all), and require stricter checking of applicant&#8217;s social security numbers.</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a clarification of the legislation&#8221; stated Nancy Pelosi. Pelosi denied requests from moderate Republicans for more time before the vote, which is scheduled for today, in order to try and get more supporters from their conservative partners.</p>
<p>The bill will almost certainly pass a majority vote before going on to get vetoed by our obstinate president. The changes made to the bill address his concerns except that the money is still coming from a cigarette tax which he opposes. Let&#8217;s hope that this time our Representatives will be able to override the veto and get the protection in place that our children deserve.</p>
<p><a href="http://wwjv4.com/wp-admin/Mike%20Viqueira">Mike Viqueira, NBC News&#8217; reporter,</a> has seen a lot of anger in the House Republicans who feel that these changes might just cause enough Republicans to deflect and actually support America&#8217;s children.  The changes are specifically targeted to 38 Republicans who supported the veto and then wrote a letter detailing their concerns. The bill&#8217;s supporters are certain that these concerns are addressed now in the new legislation.</p>
<p>This just may mean success, now that their &#8220;legitimate&#8221; concerns have been addressed it will be harder for them to refuse to listen to a majority of American citizens, their constituents, without seriously damaging their opportunity for reelection. My fingers are crossed.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/politics/bush-will-again-veto-schip-68/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCHIP Vigil</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/activism/schip-vigil-40</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/activism/schip-vigil-40#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCHIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/politics/schip-vigil-40</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This evening I took my 5 and 6 year old to our state capital building to participate in a candlelight vigil urging Congress to override the president&#8217;s veto of SCHIP. My kids were excited to go and I wondered how much they really grasped of what was going on. I asked our 6 year old [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This evening I took my 5 and 6 year old to our state capital building to participate in a candlelight vigil urging Congress to override the president&#8217;s veto of SCHIP.  My kids were excited to go and I wondered how much they really grasped of what was going on. I asked our 6 year old son what he thought we were doing.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re gonna hold candles and make George Bush say he&#8217;s sorry.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;What should he apologize for?&#8221; I asked bemused at his answer.</p>
<p>&#8220;He doesn&#8217;t want all the kids to go to the doctor and get shots and be healthy every day.&#8221;</p>
<p>At this point his 5 year old sister chimed it, &#8220;It&#8217;s because he&#8217;s wrong, he thinks kids don&#8217;t want to go to the doctor but they really really do. Maybe he just needs a hug and a time out.&#8221;</p>
<p>To set the stage a little we do explain in child friendly age appropriate terms what is going on in our country, especially if it impacts them or someone close to them. We try very hard to present facts and not to indoctrinate them into our personal beliefs. We encourage critical thinking, asking questions, and being able to come up with your own ideas on things.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m usually pretty amazed at the way the kids, especially the younger ones, grasp things. They are very caring and at times inform others of their opinions. Tonight we ran by the store to buy candles and our daughter was chatting up everyone she could about the importance of the &#8220;candle virgil&#8221; and how &#8220;George Bush said &#8216;no healthy surance!&#8217;&#8221;</p>
<p>This enthusiasm and genuine empathy for others is something that I wished people never lost. If we could just see things through the eyes of a child more often perhaps we would be better off.</p>
<p>The vigil was wonderful, all the kids there did an awesome job and should be an inspiration to us adults. Our daughter did scare one little girl with the statement, &#8220;kids need healthy surance so they can get shots!&#8221; but overall it was great. Oh, and if anyone sees a chalk drawing on the sidewalk outside of the capital building that looks an awful lot like a part of the male anatomy, my son assures me it is a snail going to the doctor. I guess he has &#8220;healthy surance&#8221;.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t already please contact your Representatives and urge them to override the president&#8217;s veto on SCHIP. You can find the contact info <a href="http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/">HERE</a>.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/activism/schip-vigil-40/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working Around The Truth</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/politics/working-around-the-truth-25</link>
		<comments>http://wwjv4.com/politics/working-around-the-truth-25#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Summer Ludwig</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Putnam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Rangel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Face the Nation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCHIP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/uncategorized/working-around-the-truth-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday morning I was watching the usual round of Sunday news shows. One of the big stories, besides Chris Matthews new book, was the presidential veto of SCHIP. On Face the Nation, Bob Schieffer had on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY), and Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL). I was really interested in seeing how anyone could defend [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday morning I was watching the usual round of Sunday news shows. One of the big stories, besides Chris Matthews new book, was the presidential veto of SCHIP. On <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/ftn/main3460.shtml">Face the Nation</a>, Bob Schieffer had on Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY), and Rep. Adam Putnam (R-FL). I was really interested in seeing how anyone could defend the president&#8217;s decision to veto this bill intelligently. It worked out pretty much like I expected. Putnam turned the tables on the Democrats accusing them of not wanting to hold the States accountable for the money that they do have and for not compromising with the president.</p>
<p>He did agree with some other conservatives that this could be a stepping stone toward Universal Healthcare and that was not acceptable to him or the president. When these arguments were refuted, fairly well, by Rangel who pointed out that this was an offer of insurance, not healtcare, that it would cover 10 million children in america, and that they have been in ongoing negotiations with the White House as their first request was for 50 billion dollars and not the 35 billion dollars they have worked it down to. He explained that by dropping the figure lower they would lose coverage for over 1 million children. Rangel asserted that it is the White House who is not willing to work with Congress on a bipartisan bill supported by the majority of American citizens.</p>
<p>I immediately thought ahead wondering what the rebuttal would be from Putnam. Imagine my anger when this is what spewed from his smarmy mouth. <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=3339930n">&#8220;This is a telling statement that he&#8217;s more interested in playing political games than compromising.&#8221;</a> WTF? That &#8220;statement&#8221; had never been uttered by Mr. Rangel, in fact he had just explained the negotiations that were still taking place.</p>
<p>In addition to flat out deceit, Putnam bolstered his position by saying that 2 million children would be covered by SCHIP who already have private insurance. He is very opposed to taking children away from private insurance. Remember, SCHIP will aid families who make too much for Medicaid assistance but too little for private health insurance. For those families that have sacrificed to secure private health insurance at exorbitant rates, this would be a huge assistance. This would free up money for them to get groceries, pay bills, etc. and still have peace of mind that their kids&#8217; medical needs will be met.</p>
<p>It does not sound to me like the Republicans are the party for average, working America. This is something that Democrats have known for a long time, maybe something like this will motivate America to demand that their government listen to them, to demand the Republican party and this administration be accountable to their constituents. America deserves much more than rhetorical games to explain why our government; which is to rule for the people, is ignoring our plain wishes on nearly every major issue. As of yesterday morning the House was about 15-20 votes shy of the amount needed to override the veto. Please go <a href="http://www.familiesusa.org/bushvskids/">HERE</a> and write your representative, let them know that you support health insurance coverage for children in America.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://wwjv4.com/politics/working-around-the-truth-25/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

