Firedoglake.com is reporting that Fred Phelps and family, otherwise known as the Westboro Baptist Church of Topeka Ks, have been ordered to pay $10.9 Million to the family of slain marine Matthew Snyder. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained international notoriety because of their revolting picket signs and loathsome all around behavior. If there ever was a group that embodied hatred, intolerance, and bigotry better than the Phelps I can’t imagine who they would be.
After saying that I am as surprised as you to be writing that I do not approve of this ruling. In fact, more than anything else I have written here, this piece embodies the true importance of protecting our constitution. While the actions of the Westboro Baptist Church are unthinkably revolting they still fall under protected speech as guaranteed by our 1st amendment. In addition their peaceful protests are also constitutionally protected. As a nation that prides ourselves on our freedoms we must work to ensure that we extend those freedoms to everyone, even those whose message we disagree with.
When we start down the path of censoring unpopular messages we start allowing our courts and government decide what thoughts and feelings are allowable. This is the same problem you run into when you remove books from public libraries, or try to make burning the flag illegal. It is a slippery slope between censoring the most unpopular and revolting speech and censoring all speech. So regardless of your personal feelings for the actions the Phelps take and the hatred they embody you must support their constitutional rights to express those feelings because to do anything else would spell the destruction of our way of life.
The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one’s time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all. ~ H.L. Mencken (1880 -1956)
I know that there are many many people celebrating this as a victory for homosexual rights and even a victory for the dignity of our fallen soldiers whose funerals the Phelps picket. I envy their joy at this ruling. Instead of feeling joy at victory over bigotry and hatred I instead feel sadness at the loss of freedom. That it was the death of a brave soldier, who fought and died in the name of freedom abroad, that was the catalyst for this loss of our freedoms here at home only amplifies the tragedy and sadness of this ruling.
That’s all I feel like writing on this subject. With luck the name Fred Phelps will never have to be written on this blog again. I regret having to give him this much time but I feel that the importance of this ruling needed to be shared.
Important Update:
In the spirit of the first amendment rights that Fred Phelps is fighting for I have decided to link to an interesting story about the Phelps family. The story is titled “Addicted to Hate” by Jon Michael Bell and chronicles the life of Fred Phelps. I highly recommend reading this if you have even a passing interest in the Phelps despite its length.




2007-11-01 17:29:46
This ruling needs to be overturned, since it is a strike at free speech. This is a first amendment case all the way. I find the Phelp’s verbage insulting and inflammatory, also. I find picketing funerals terribly offensive. Yet I want to allow even the worst of speech such as this, so that all speech will be protected. The government is a fearful master and this is a case in point. We have the judicial arm of the government stepping all over free speech. The judiciary is supposed to be the weakest branch by design. I view the homosexual activists who picketed on one side and Phelps on the other, as both extremists at the 2002 love one out conference in Kansas City.
Government is dangerous and its power has been abused. Take the the Philadelphia eleven that were arrested under the new hate crime legislation for speaking out about gay issues at a gay outfest. The DA Charles Ehrlich protrayed the bible verses used to call sodomy a moral crime by the eleven as a threat to the safety of 500 gay people who attempted to riot. In this instance all three branches of the government were used to criminalize and imprison eleven people for free speech. The legislature passed a horrible law that criminalizes speech, the police enforced it, and the court brought serious felony and misdemeanor charges against them. The government needs to be leaner and kept in check by good men, in order to safeguard our freedoms, including speech, press, religion, and assembly.
2007-11-01 19:27:26
Sean, your statement that the “Philadelphia 11″ were arrested under new hate crime legislation is a little misleading. The event took place just over 3 years ago so its not really a new law anymore. While I have not been able to find a non-biased reference to the case the 11 were arrested for “criminal conspiracy,” “failure to disperse,” “disorderly conduct” and “obstructing a highway.” While I do not know the exact details the charges did not include anything that would make me think that new anti-hate laws were the cause of the arrest.
I hear this case brought up as proof that hate crime legislation is going to be used to target Christians, yet I never hear of any others. I’m not saying that there have not been more, but I would think that after 3 years the Christians could point to more than one case as proof of their ongoing persecution. More than likely this is another instance where an arrest that would have happened anyways is used to protest an unpopular law. If you know of a reliable news source that gives more details of the arrest I would be interested in reading it.
Other than that I am glad we have found something we agree with.