<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nicaraguan Doctors Fighting Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104</link>
	<description>A liberal political/religious blog calling attention to the rampant hypocrisy of the far right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 22:05:15 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>William</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104#comment-227</guid>
		<description>Sean, I applaud your passion on this issue, I just feel that instead of restricting women&#039;s reproductive rights you should concentrate on reducing the need for abortions.  It has been proven that making abortions illegal does not reduce the number of abortions.  Therefore if the goal is truly to reduce abortions, the dialog needs to be on what can be done to actually achieve this.  I&#039;m actually in the middle of writing a post on exactly this issue now.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I applaud your passion on this issue, I just feel that instead of restricting women&#8217;s reproductive rights you should concentrate on reducing the need for abortions.  It has been proven that making abortions illegal does not reduce the number of abortions.  Therefore if the goal is truly to reduce abortions, the dialog needs to be on what can be done to actually achieve this.  I&#8217;m actually in the middle of writing a post on exactly this issue now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wwjv4.com/religion/nicaraguan-doctors-fighting-back-104#comment-226</guid>
		<description>There is one example of a legitimate abortion - ectopic pregnancy.  But, I don&#039;t follow your logic on using the alledged 80 abortion-banned deaths, to kill more babies through abortions?  Where are the babies rights groups.  Why are the babies always treated as worthless?  Anyway, you know both sides of the arguement, so I won&#039;t go on.  It just seems that no one thinks of the baby when we are talking policy.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one example of a legitimate abortion &#8211; ectopic pregnancy.  But, I don&#8217;t follow your logic on using the alledged 80 abortion-banned deaths, to kill more babies through abortions?  Where are the babies rights groups.  Why are the babies always treated as worthless?  Anyway, you know both sides of the arguement, so I won&#8217;t go on.  It just seems that no one thinks of the baby when we are talking policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

