A House committee voted last week to send to the floor a resolution that would label the killing of 1.5 million Armenians by Turkey in 1915 genocide. Incensed, Turkey threatened that if this measure is passed by the full House they would reconsider their support of the Iraq war.
The US ships supplies through Turkey from a large air base in Incirlik. If Turkey stopped allowing this the US would have to shift battle plans. All of this comes at the same time the US was working to persuade Turkey to use diplomatic means to deal with Kurdish insurgents along the Northern Iraqi border. Turkey was threatening military use and the Bush administration was doing their damnedest to try and dissuade them.
The Kurdish controlled section of Northern Iraq is relatively stable, the possibility of enlarging the war has been something the US has worked hard to prevent.
Now CBSNews.com is breaking the story that Turkey has fired at least 250 rounds and 11 missiles across the border into the mountains of Northern Iraq. The Turkish government had issued a statement last week that any military force used would be only against the insurgents whom they say have participated in armed attacks across the border.
The Kurds are now calling for American troops to intervene and stop the “crisis” that is evolving. With US troops already stretched thin, having to reinforce a formerly fairly secure area, will be a blow that will potentially cause a setback to the “progress” we’re hearing from Iraq.
Turkey was angered enough that the House Foreign Relations Committee even had a vote on the Armenian genocide issue that they pulled their ambassador out of the US. They had warned that such a vote would strain relations between them and the US and any further activity would further strain relations. The administration has publicly stated that the vote was misguided and that because there are national security interests at stake it should not go forth. Nancy Pelosi declared that the resolution will be heard on the House floor.
This puts the US in a strange place with an ally. We may be needed to militarily defend Northern Iraq from the Turkish assault at the same time we are pissing them off with our political condemnation of the 1915 genocide. One has to wonder if this is what members of the House had in mind when voting on and passing this measure on to the House floor.
The president has not listened to Congress’ input in the way the war is going, we are on the same failed path with thousands of dead soldiers and close to a million dead Iraqi’s, and there aren’t enough votes to override even a veto on children’s health insurance. Perhaps the next step is to make it very difficult to continue major combat operations in Iraq.
This is completely my own inference here and I am in no way claiming to know what is going on in the minds of those in Congress, but it does seem to make sense. With an already unpopular war as far as the rest of the world is concerned, perhaps the way out is to make our remaining allies pull their support.
I do not personally think this is a wise course and I hope that I am wrong. There are certainly other things that can be done to stop the war. The first being to stop funding it; stop believing the fear mongering White House and being bullied into passing spending bills that Congress and the American people don’t agree with.




2007-10-17 12:52:47
The real story in this topic, is the democratic congresses behind the scenes attempt to knock off an ally in war on terror in the Iraqi front. I see congress as intentionally using this resolution to anger Turkey, in order to cause Turkey to back out of their support of the war. This is divisive and this does not facillitate building alliances. We need to get the dirty politics out of the war on radical Islam. We need to defend our country, for we were attacked in 90’s and then again sept 11th. Islam says kill the infidel. Their goal is total world domination under shariah law. We have to take their writings and speeches serious. I make make little distinction between suni, shiite, wahaabi sects. They all rely on the same basic source documents - Kuran and Hadeeth. Our present congress seems to be deliberately trying to sabotage the war in order to win elections and power, in this latest attempt of disrepecting Turkey.
2007-10-17 15:08:03
Sean, I’m not sure we should be sending the message that all you need to do to get away with genocide is to build strategic ties with the US. Also, why isn’t the right attacking Bush for pissing off China? China holds a huge portion of our debt and is pivotal in our attempts to enact any sort of pressure on Iran.
If the contention that we shouldn’t label Turkeys killing of 1.5 million as genocide because we need them is true then it should be even more true of China. That is of course assuming that the right wants to enact sanctions on Iran, which they don’t. Being unable to enact sanctions (because you pissed off China) would give the neocons a good excuse to bomb Iran.
2007-10-17 15:50:44
I find the timing of these resolutions to be suspect. These resolutions follow many failed attempts by this congress to out-right villify the President for waging war against an enemy that first attacked us. This congress has threatened or led many investigations into the war, the President, and White house staff. These investigations look to me to be politically motivated. Also the congress slings mud, so to speak, and hopes something will stick. They are almost always negative and they have little show in doing the people’s work on capitol hill.
I am not too familiar with the Turkey’s culpability in genocide but I will look it up. I do question why if this is 100 year old crime it is being voted on now as a resolution of condemnation. And hasn’t the congress passed similar resolutions in the past in regards to Turkey? Why do it again and again? And why is now the right time to bring it up?
2007-10-17 15:55:59
“These resolutions follow many failed attempts by this congress to out-right villify the President for waging war against an enemy that first attacked us.”
When did Iraq attack us?
2007-10-17 16:07:58
You have mischaracterized the war. The enemy is not the Iraq, per se. The enemy is radical Islamist, who were in Iraq and are still there. In fact, Iraq has drawn hostiles from other nations to Iraq; Hostiles that would have otherwise been able to devote their full attention to planning and attacking America and other democratic countries. We are winning through patience and strength in Iraq. Iraq is going to be a strong ally against radicals in the future who want to do us harm. These same radicals would like to detonate a dirty bomb in a US city. These same radicals, motivated by the Koran, have already bombed trains in Spain. They are haters, they are violent, and they are deadly, and they must be stopped.
2007-10-17 16:49:11
There was no “Al Queada in Iraq” until 2005, and it was brought there, not by Iraq but by hatred toward an US occupation of a sovereign nation.
We invaded and occupied Iraq, who had NOTHING to do with 9/11;. Sadaam Hussein was a secular leader and not a radical islamist. The Iraq war was illegal, immoral, and continues to kill both our troops and innocent Iraqis every single day.