Supporting the Separation of Church and State

Archive for December, 2007

Lyrical Terrorist Free

Samina Malik A.K.A the Lyrical Terrorist, who was convicted of thought crimes has escaped a long prison sentence (( 12/7/2007 The New York Times Britain: ‘Lyrical Terrorist’ Spared Prison )) . Instead of the 10 years she could have been sentenced she was given a suspended 9 month sentence. Obviously this show of compassion and dare we say common sense from the courts was the right choice. History has shown that you cannot destroy a message by censoring and punishing the writers. Instead in the face of oppression the message only flourashes and grows.

See the story I wrote last month “What’s On Your Bookshelf” for more information on this story and my take on it.

As bad as Samina Malik’s situation was I cant help but think it would be worse in America. I would like some help on this one though. I simply do not have the time to properly research this so I was hoping one of you will. What protections would an American have in the same situation now that Habeas Corpus has been destroyed?

Summer’s Response to Ron Paul Supporters

Categorized: Politics

The article I wrote entitled 10 Reasons Not to Vote for Ron Paul has generated tons of comments, most from his supporters. Here is just a quick response to some of these. I have not provided references within this response but please see the previous article for tons of them.

Ok, so I am going to try and put my thoughts down and make sense while doing it. A whole lot of responses have been along the vein of “But he’s only going to be president, I don’t agree with him but he can’t mess up that badly.”

What about Congress, the Supreme Court? These other branches are not going to be filled with people who will make sure that he won’t mess things up too bad. When you think about who you are going to vote for, you have to look at the whole picture.

The fact is that Ron Paul has sponsored 346 bills since Jan 7, 1997, of which 341 haven’t made it out of committee and 0 were successfully enacted. He may have big ideas and want to really change things but he hasn’t been successful thus far.

So if I buy into his rhetoric, which I don’t, I am still faced with the fact that the Paul presidency could be an entire 4 years with a “lame duck” president.

The Bush administration has raped this country, and others, and left us with a huge gaping hole where once we had our civil rights and integrity. Again, Paul’s rhetoric sounds nice, “The Constitution!” is his war cry. However, as a liberal Democrat, it is very important to me to ensure that all of our citizens really are afforded equal rights. Ron Paul does not support this, with his words he doesn’t support this, with his record he doesn’t support this.

People have picked apart my arguments and most have countered with inaneness or just craziness. For instance, it certainly does matter on the issue of abortion whether or not his record matches what he says. He’s personally against it but would leave it up to the states, yet he has several time proposed legislation that would label a fetus a human. Now, in all reality how would that not lead to a ban on abortion, at least for the majority of the country?

So, then there’s an abortion ban and still no good sex education or contraceptive availability. Even if America defies statistics and abortions end there, what happens to the thousands of unwanted babies? Social services that would have helped them are gone under Paul, it may surprise the Religious Right, but unwanted children aren’t exactly snatched up and adopted. What then?

Our homosexual citizens will see no relief in their quest for equal rights. Again his personal views and record don’t support his rhetoric on this issue. Like most president’s he will have a cabinet and nominate justices that are in line with his views.

Our environment will be further destroyed. He sponsored a bill that would stop conservation efforts that interfered with recreational boating. That doesn’t sound to me like someone with good priorities.

It has been shown in our recent history, remember the Industrial Revolution, that without some sort of regulation (ie OSHA and the minimum wage) business owners take great advantage of their workers, at times to the cost of their lives. Just because someon has an ideal of how things should be that doesn’t change basic human nature. Businesses will still be greedy and without oversight we will end up right back to those good ol’ days of worker abuse.

Now, do I think that the government is run efficiently? Absolutely not, but I do believe that there are ways to fix the things that are broken without removing the whole system and thus ensuring chaos. Someone said either here or on Reddit, that basically both Republicans and Democrats want smaller government just in different places. The difference in my view, is that Democrats want our people protected and our tax money to fund programs to help the taxpayer. The other side would do the opposite, cut social services, give incentives to big business, and further discrimination.

While Paul talks a good talk it is clear, to me, that he is just like every other Republican candidate underneath except a lot more eccentric. And just to reiterate I encourage EVERYONE to RESEARCH on their own, I do not expect, nor want, anyone to make decisions based on other peoples’ opinions.

Tom Tancredos Top 3 Election Issues

Tom Tancredo is widely known as the candidate most likely to appeal to racists, bigots, and xenophobes. So, aside from going for the conservative fundamentalist Christian vote, what else is Tom Tancredo doing? Here are three television commercials that he has run, outlining his top three issues for presidency. I think that they pretty much say everything about his platform.

ISSUE #1: Immigrants are stealing our country

YouTube Preview Image

ISSUE #2: Immigrants want to blow up malls

YouTube Preview Image

ISSUE #3: Immigrants come here to rape and kill our daughters

YouTube Preview Image

So there you have it, the top 3 issues in the Tom Tancredo presidency. Basically his message is that if you hate the scary brown people as much as he does then he wants your vote. Because things like the economy, civil rights, national security, and the Iraq war can wait until the next president; right now we need a 2,000 mile long wall across Mexico. That will surely stop the Mexicans since they wont be able to raid across on their horses. Or was that the Mongolians?

Seriously, Ron Paul should join forces with Tom Tancredo. No force on earth could stand up against their combined might of crazy and asshole. They would be invincible.

10 Reasons Not to Vote for Ron Paul

Categorized: Politics, Republicans

As anyone with a blog, YouTube account, MySpace page, or web site knows Ron Paul supporters are everywhere! The internet is filled with them. Although we are a progressive blog and both William and I support Democratic candidates, vocally, we are constantly barraged with pleas and “stories” to win us over. The frightening thing that I have witnessed is that many liberal voters are giving some credence to Ron Paul’s campaign and message. He somehow comes across as different or better than the run of the mill conservatives filling the Republican ticket.

I do not support Ron Paul in ANY and I find his Congressional record and policies to be, at times, even scarier than his counterparts. The only thing that I have found to agree with him on is the fact that he does not support the war in Iraq. After extensive research I have compiled a list of 10 reasons NOT to vote for Ron Paul!

  1. Ron Paul does not value equal rights for minorities. Ron Paul has sponsored legislation that would repeal affirmative action, keep the IRS from investigating private schools who may have used race as a factor in denying entrance, thus losing their tax exempt status, would limit the scope of Brown versus Board of Education, and would deny citizenship for those born in the US if their parents are not citizens. Here are links to these bills: H.R.3863, H.R.5909, H.J.RES.46, and H.J.RES.42.
  2. Ron Paul would deny women control of their bodies and reproductive rights.Ron Paul makes it very clear that one of his aims is to repeal Roe v. Wade. He has also co sponsored 4 separate bills to “To provide that human life shall be deemed to exist from conception.” This, of course, goes against current medical and scientific information as well as our existing laws and precedents. Please see these links: H.R.2597 and H.R.392
  3. Ron Paul would be disastrous for the working class. He supports abolishing the Federal minimum wage, has twice introduced legislation to repeal OSHA, or the Occupational Safety and Health Act and would deal devastating blows to Social Security including repealing the act that makes it mandatory for employees of nonprofits, to make “coverage completely optional for both present and future workers”, and would “freeze benefit levels”. He has also twice sponsored legislation seeking to repeal the Davis-Bacon Act and the Copeland Act which among other things provide that contractors for the federal government must provide the prevailing wage and prohibits corporate “kick backs.” Here are the related legislative links: H.R.2030, H.R.4604, H.R.736, and H.R.2720
  4. Ron Paul’s tax plan is unfair to lower earners and would greatly benefit those with the highest incomes.He has repeatedly submitted amendments to the tax code that would get rid of the estate and gift taxes, tax all earners at 10%, disallow income tax credits to individuals who are not corporations, repeal the elderly tax credit, child care credit, earned income credit, and other common credits for working class citizens. Please see this link for more information: H.R.05484 Summary
  5. Ron Paul’s policies would cause irreparable damage to our already strained environment. Among other travesties he supports off shore drilling, building more oil refineries, mining on federal lands, no taxes on the production of fuel, and would stop conservation efforts that could be a “Federal obstacle” to building and maintaining refineries. He has also sought to amend the Clean Air Act, repeal the Soil and Water Conservation Act of 1977, and to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to “restrict the jurisdiction of the United States over the discharge of dredged or fill material to discharges into waters”. To see for yourself the possible extent of the damage to the environment that would happen under a Paul administration please follow these links: H.R.2504, H.R.7079, H.R.7245, H.R.2415, H.R.393, H.R.4639, H.R.5293, and H.R.6936
  6. A Ron Paul administration would continue to proliferate the negative image of the US among other nations. Ron Paul supports withdrawing the US from the UN, when that has not happened he has fought to at least have the US withdrawn from the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. He has introduced legislation to keep the US from giving any funds to the UN. He also submitted that the US funds should not be used in any UN peacekeeping mission or any UN program at all. He has sponsored a bill calling for us to “terminate all participation by the United States in the United Nations, and to remove all privileges, exemptions, and immunities of the United Nations.”Ron Paul twice supported stopping the destruction of intercontinental ballistic missile silos in the United States. He also would continue with Bush’s plan of ignoring international laws by maintaining an insistence that the International Criminal Court does not apply to the US, despite President Clinton’s signature on the original treaty. The International Criminal Court is used for, among other things, prosecution of war crimes. Please see the following links: H.R.3891, H.AMDT.191, H.AMDT.190, H.R.3769, H.R.1665, H.CON.RES.23, and H.R.1154
  7. Ron Paul discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation and would not provide equal rights and protections to glbt citizens. This is an issue that Paul sort of dances around. He has been praised for stating that the federal government should not regulate who a person marries. This has been construed by some to mean that he is somewhat open to the idea of same sex marriage, he is not. Paul was an original co sponsor of the Marriage Protection Act in the House in 2004. Among other things this discriminatory piece of legislation placed a prohibition on the recognition of a same sex marriage across state borders. He said in 2004 that if he was in the Texas legislature he would not allow judges to come up with “new definitions” of marriage. Paul is a very religious conservative and though he is careful with his words his record shows that he is not a supporter of same sex marriage. In 1980 he introduced a particularly bigoted bill entitled “A bill to strengthen the American family and promote the virtues of family life.” or H.R.7955 A direct quote from the legislation “Prohibits the expenditure of Federal funds to any organization which presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style.” shows that he is unequivocally opposed to lifestyles other than heterosexual.
  8. Ron Paul has an unnatural obsession with guns. One of Paul’s loudest gripes is that the second amendment of the constitution is being eroded. In fact, he believes that September 11 would not have happened if that wasn’t true. He advocates for there to be no restrictions on personal ownership of semi-automatic weaponry or large capacity ammunition feeding devices, would repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act (because we all know our schools are just missing more guns), wants guns to be allowed in our National Parks, and repeal the Gun Control Act of 1968. Now, I’m pretty damn certain that when the Constitution was written our founding fathers never intended for people to be walking around the streets with AK47’s and “large capacity ammunition feeding devices.” (That just sounds scary.) Throughout the years our Constitution has been amended and is indeed a living document needing changes to stay relevant in our society. Paul has no problem changing the Constitution when it fits his needs, such as no longer allowing those born in the US to be citizens if their parents are not. On the gun issue though he is no holds barred. I know he’s from Texas but really, common sense tells us that the amendments he is seeking to repeal have their place. In fact, the gun control act was put into place after the assassinations of JFK, Martin Luther King, and Robert Kennedy. Please view the following links: H.R.2424, H.R.1897, H.R.1096, H.R.407, H.R.1147, and H.R.3892.
  9. Ron Paul would butcher our already sad educational system. The fact is that Ron Paul wants to privatize everything and that includes education. Where we run into problems is that it has been shown (think our current health care system) that this doesn’t work so well in practice. Ron Paul has introduced legislation that would keep the Federal Government “from planning, developing, implementing, or administering any national teacher test or method of certification and from withholding funds from States or local educational agencies that fail to adopt a specific method of teacher certification.” In a separate piece of legislation he seeks to “prohibit the payment of Federal Education assistance in States which require the licensing or certification of private schools or private school teachers.” So basically the federal government can’t regulate teaching credentials and if states opt to require them for private schools they get no aid. That sounds like a marvelous idea teachers with no certification teaching in private schools that are allowed to discriminate on the basis of race. He is certainly moving forward with these proposals!Remember his “bill to strengthen the American family and promote the virtues of family life.” or H.R.7955? Guess what? He basically advocates for segregation in schools once again. It “Forbids any court of the United States from requiring the attendance at a particular school of any student because of race, color, creed, or sex.” Without thinking about this statement it doesn’t sound bad at all. But remember, when desegregating schools that this is done by having children go to different schools, often after a court decision as in Brown Vs. Board of Education. If this were a bill that passed, schools would no longer be compelled to comply and the schools would go back to segregation based on their locations. Ron Paul is really starting to look like a pretty bigoted guy don’t you think?
  10. Ron Paul is opposed to the separation of church and state. This reason is probably behind every other thing that I disagree with in regards to Paul’s positions. Ron Paul is among those who believes that there is a war on religion, he stated “Through perverse court decisions and years of cultural indoctrination, the elitist, secular Left has managed to convince many in our nation that religion must be driven from public view.” (( Koyaanisqatsi Blog: Wrong Paul Why I Do Not Want Ron Paul to be My President )) Though he talks a good talk, at times, Ron Paul can’t get away from his far right, conservative views. He would support “alternative views” to evolution taught in public schools (i.e. Intelligent Design.) We’ve already taken a look at his “bill to strengthen the American family and promote the virtues of family life.” or H.R.7955 Besides hating the gays he takes a very religious stance on many other things. He is attempting to force his beliefs on the rest of America, exactly what he would do as president.

So there you have it, my 10 reasons not to vote for Ron Paul. Please take the time to thoroughly review the records of the people running for office so you know where they really stand. Ron Paul has good rhetoric and he opposes the war but he’s not a good man in the human rights sense of the phrase. He is pretty much like every other Republican but more insidious. Here is a video that you should watch after reading this article. Really listen to what he says and how he says it. Watch out for the sneaky ones and RESEARCH! (( Orcinus: Ron Paul’s Record in Congress ))

YouTube Preview Image

UPDATE: I am posting a blog entry response to some of the feedback a little after 1 pm CST. I am also working on a more thorough referenced response that will hopefully be up by this evening. Also, the majority of the comments on this post appear to be thoughtful and honest and we appreciate that, the dialog that takes place between two or more conflicting viewpoints is much more productive when done in this manner.

Top 5 Reasons For Republican Sex Scandals

Please note that these are just my observations and opinions. I am by no means saying that Christian Republicans are the only people with dirty little secrets. I am merely commenting on what appears to be a growing issue within the Republican ranks. In the last couple of years the list has grown and grown so I think the situation should be examined. Here are the Top 5 Reasons for Republican Sex Scandals, in my opinion, of course.

  • Power. Most of us equate “Republican” with “Christian Right” they do not all fall neatly into that category but many do. That’s quite a combination of power, political influence and God. Since most sex crimes are about power and control and not sexual release, it stands to reason that the sort of people who would commit said crimes would try and place themselves in a position of power, such as Congressman, church elder, etc.

  • Sexual hangups stemming from a lifetime of “sex is dirty” lectures at home, at the pulpit, and in our supposedly religion free schools. This one is pretty self explanatory, make something dirty or taboo and it becomes more wanted, yet not openly for the most part. Like Larry Craig in the stall, the desires of our religious Republican leaders are hidden, making them all the more scandalous when they are revealed.

  • The Church encourages members to be closed to the outside world, creating a haven for those people who might be pedophiles or other such lowly creatures to select and prey upon their victims. We see the perfect example of this in the Catholic priest scandals. The Church wanted it all handled internally so instead of prosecution, the offenders were shuffled around receiving even more opportunities to hurt children.

  • Republicans and the Religious Right do not foster amongst themselves, or anywhere else for that matter, a furtherance of civil rights. Women are subject to their husbands, minorities are not given equal treatment, and if you are gay then you are damned. This automatically leads to secrecy and shame if you are different, a desire to keep things, such as abuse, quiet and not to “rock the boat”. A common family theme from religious, conservative households is that what happens in the home stays in the home. Again this is something that is seen on a larger scale within religious communities themselves. When progress is not being made on personal rights and protections the people who need help the most are ignored and left to fend for themselves. Thus children will be molested and not feel free to say something, a woman (or man) may be pressured into an inappropriate relationship and not feel like they can report it, or a gay Congressperson or clergy member may push their identities so far down that their true selves are revealed through desperate or illegal acts. (Gay hookers and meth)

  • The lack of an internal moral compass. I suspect that this will be the most controversial of my opinions on this matter. Please let me explain. Whenever I am debating anything with a zealous religious conservative I am bound to be confronted with “If we didn’t have the Bible we wouldn’t know how to act morally” or “Without God to judge our actions we would have no reason to behave ethically.”

    This argument infuriates me on several levels. The first, of course, is that I am a very nice person. I do not murder, torture, rape, pillage, or plunder and I do not have a personal relationship with any deity, I do not follow the teachings of a holy book, indeed I do not believe in the fairy tales of religion. The second reason this argument angers me is that it is not factually based. Just a little bit of research will show that secular societies are much more peaceful than religious ones, for the most part.

    This is not something that is able to be logically argued with a Christian the majority of the time. They really don’t understand how anyone could live a moral life without the bible or a god watching over them in judgment. That leads me to believe that these individuals may not have a moral compass like millions of other people do. The common sense voice inside that tells you it’s not ok to steal, lie, and kill. In fact, I believe that many are actually fairly blood thirsty and hateful people. Nothing gets to me more than the “culture of life” advocating for the death penalty, wanting to stop social services, and promoting discrimination against whatever difference is in style at the moment. These are the people from which spring the likes of the Minutemen at our borders and an administration who is killing thousands of people in the name of their god.

    Because most religious people grow up being indoctrinated into their belief system it is easy to see how this lack of a moral compass can develop. They follow a loosely tied together historical book to the letter (on some things) that was written and compiled by men with definite political, social, and personal agendas of their own. A book that promotes slavery, the oppression of women, rape as a way to celebrate victorious bloody battles, murder, incest, and the list goes on and on. Because I believe that most humans innately possess the feelings and understanding needed to behave in a moral, ethical manner, it makes sense to me that one would recoil from the vile teachings of the bible. This creates a maelstrom of confusion within the believer. They have been taught that this is the holy word of god and yet it goes against our natural feelings of what is right, this begins a struggle in which the natural feelings of revulsion lose out to the promise of eternal life and blessings. For most people this is not a conscious process or choice, they have been told over and over that the Bible is right and unerring so it follows a natural path. This then leads to the reality that these people have effectively squashed their inner voice of right and wrong and thus we see this tragic process played out in the media.

So there you have it, the Top 5 Reasons for Republican Sex Scandals, as I see it. Admittedly this is my own conjecture, I am interested in your take on the numerous sexual (and other) scandals plaguing our religious right as a whole and the Republican party specifically.